Of course, but the voice does change with age. Hugh naturally isn't going to sound the same at 72 as he did when he was 26 or whatever. Even folks like Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger aren't exempt from things like that!kenl wrote: ↑02 Feb 2022, 23:19Baz's vocals are nothing like Hugh's.StanInBlack wrote: ↑02 Feb 2022, 23:01 The moment the writer said that Baz's vocals bore a resemblance to Hugh's, I immediately felt like every word in the piece was suspect after that.
Has the writer seen Hugh in the Stranglers? In fact, the way Hugh sounds now is very different to how he did in the 70s
Aberdeen review
Moderator: StanInBlack
- StanInBlack
- Man Of The Earth
- Posts: 5600
- Joined: 04 Apr 2002, 10:30
- Location: Durham, England.
Re: Aberdeen review
Re: Aberdeen review
Of course and we can all agree on that, on the subject of Jagger, his voice is still great IMHO, JJs voice is pretty good but of course Hugh and JJ have lost the range, but it's age of course. Lt Kudu.StanInBlack wrote: ↑03 Feb 2022, 00:08Of course, but the voice does change with age. Hugh naturally isn't going to sound the same at 72 as he did when he was 26 or whatever. Even folks like Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger aren't exempt from things like that!kenl wrote: ↑02 Feb 2022, 23:19Baz's vocals are nothing like Hugh's.StanInBlack wrote: ↑02 Feb 2022, 23:01 The moment the writer said that Baz's vocals bore a resemblance to Hugh's, I immediately felt like every word in the piece was suspect after that.
Has the writer seen Hugh in the Stranglers? In fact, the way Hugh sounds now is very different to how he did in the 70s