Aberdeen review

JJ Burnel, ...., Baz Warne, Jim Macaulay.

Moderator: StanInBlack

User avatar
StanInBlack
Man Of The Earth
Man Of The Earth
Posts: 5579
Joined: 04 Apr 2002, 10:30
Location: Durham, England.

Re: Aberdeen review

Post by StanInBlack »

kenl wrote: 02 Feb 2022, 23:19
StanInBlack wrote: 02 Feb 2022, 23:01 The moment the writer said that Baz's vocals bore a resemblance to Hugh's, I immediately felt like every word in the piece was suspect after that.
Baz's vocals are nothing like Hugh's.

Has the writer seen Hugh in the Stranglers? In fact, the way Hugh sounds now is very different to how he did in the 70s
Of course, but the voice does change with age. Hugh naturally isn't going to sound the same at 72 as he did when he was 26 or whatever. Even folks like Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger aren't exempt from things like that!
Greatkudu
Man Of The Earth
Man Of The Earth
Posts: 6499
Joined: 12 May 2010, 09:58

Re: Aberdeen review

Post by Greatkudu »

StanInBlack wrote: 03 Feb 2022, 00:08
kenl wrote: 02 Feb 2022, 23:19
StanInBlack wrote: 02 Feb 2022, 23:01 The moment the writer said that Baz's vocals bore a resemblance to Hugh's, I immediately felt like every word in the piece was suspect after that.
Baz's vocals are nothing like Hugh's.

Has the writer seen Hugh in the Stranglers? In fact, the way Hugh sounds now is very different to how he did in the 70s
Of course, but the voice does change with age. Hugh naturally isn't going to sound the same at 72 as he did when he was 26 or whatever. Even folks like Paul McCartney or Mick Jagger aren't exempt from things like that!
Of course and we can all agree on that, on the subject of Jagger, his voice is still great IMHO, JJs voice is pretty good but of course Hugh and JJ have lost the range, but it's age of course. Lt Kudu.
Post Reply