"Dangerous Dog act" Not Working obviously.

Other non Stranglers stuff here

Moderator: StanInBlack

dead ringer
Ugly
Ugly
Posts: 1613
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:44

Re: "Dangerous Dog act" Not Working obviously.

Post by dead ringer »

Unfortunately it would seem that many of these dangerous dogs are in fact more intelligent than their owners!
User avatar
Boody
Ugly
Ugly
Posts: 1246
Joined: 25 Jan 2014, 13:20
Location: Arse end of commuter land, always looking for an escape

Re: "Dangerous Dog act" Not Working obviously.

Post by Boody »

dead ringer wrote:Unfortunately it would seem that many of these dangerous dogs are in fact more intelligent than their owners!
Indeed - maybe the Dangerous Dogs Act should be renamed the Idiotic Owners Act.
I can't help getting old. I just refuse to grow up.
User avatar
Ravenette
Ugly
Ugly
Posts: 1849
Joined: 22 Apr 2010, 19:44
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: "Dangerous Dog act" Not Working obviously.

Post by Ravenette »

I had a Samoyed, as soft as anything. Loved people and other dogs, not one vicious bone in his body. Suddenly, one day when my hubby was walking him he pulled on Loki's lead, I think to stop him sniffing and move on, and BAM, Loki flew at him and bit his hand! I was gobsmacked when I heard, even our friends or anyone who knew him couldn't believe it.

Just goes to show, even the most gentle of dogs can be unpredictable. To this day, I have no idea why Loki flew like that.

But to label certain breeds as dangerous dogs, to me is simply narrow minded.
I've got some chloroform and handcuffs, just for you.
Post Reply